Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freddymo
Who doesn't accept it as a 3rd surface? That is exactly what it is..The question is why in the friggin world did racing need a 3rd surface.. I was all for Poly because I was convinced it was safer for horses and kept them from injuries, hence bigger fields.. Not exactly true ayh?
|
I'm not saying it did. I don't particularly care for it myself. But I am tired of listening to people blaming Jackson for not going to the BC. If the race was run on Turf would he be expected to go? Why should he go if he doesn't want to run on Poly?
Anyhow, I'm not looking to debate dirt v poly, I just really was impressed by what I saw yesterday, and I hope we see him outside of California before May of next year.