Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Of course its a crock. they had to change it to climate change to skip over the fact that there has been global cooling for about 10 years. other contrary scientific opinions that don't support the narrative are also deep sixed. the fact is that relying on models as an accurate way to understand complex and subtle climatic behavior is assinine. the system is way too complex for the puny models they use with limited data.
they selectively pick and choose the science that will support their power grab. Like I've been saying, it doesn't matter to this bunch that the current bill will not reduce atmospheric CO2 levels. this is what liberals do, enact onerous feel good laws that they can boast about how they've really done something wonderful when in fact they will cause more harm than good.
the work that will shift to China and India where they will not be limiting CO2 output will in my opinion actually increase the rate that CO2 is churned out worldwide.
|
your first paragraph ruined your second...
So you are also telling me that hurricane forecasting and weather forecasting is still just a guessing game, that it has not improved? You are selectively picking a 10 year period instead of looking at longer term. And that 10 year period you are selecting was actually predicted by some of the warming models.
It is very complex. But you are basically saying forget about it, we cant understand it, there is nothing going on basically because of your political leanings, not because you have looked at all the data. You choose the data that fits your agenda. Same thing for evolution, its too complex, we cannot understand it.
Typical for politicians.