Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Yes, Dell, when you respond to a post, but do not talk about the points raised by the other poster about the subject at hand, but rather you comment only about the poster, that is a personal attack.
It's a common response on internet lists for people that don't have any salient argument available regarding the subject matter at hand.
That some apparently repeatedly have difficulty following or understanding the points other posters may make doesn't automatically mean the posters are at fault 
|
I asked you repeatedly for whether you agree or disagree w/ Carter believing Israel's treatment of Palestinians is worse than Rwanda (missed all those Palestinians running around with burning tires hanging from them) and you went all over the place AVOIDING the subject at hand before finally saying you don't agree w/all his policies despite his great understanding of all things mid east. Then you say the dust bowl was the fault of man. I asked how did man create the draught and you go completely off subject attacking Chuck and presumably me for not having a 'salient' argument. Now I ask again please tell me how man created the draught and please keep on subject?