Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Cleveland adds Shaq, San Antonio adds Jefferson and gets back Ginobili, Boston was better than the Lakers when healthy, I still think Denver was better than the Lakers and I think Lawson as the backup PG will be a huge addition, and Orlando added Vince Carter. Meanwhile the Lakers have added nothing, have Kobe getting a year older (which is a huge factor with the number of games he has played), and likely will lose either Ariza or Odom. Everyone else is stepping forward and I think have moved ahead of the Lakers.
|
Get a grip snipe. Orlando got worse. They added a chemistry killer and lost their second best player. The addition of Jefferson was good but it still doesnt address a couple of basic matchup problems the spurs have with the lakers and thats in the post. The lakers are simply too big for them now and duncan isnt getting any younger. Cleveland adds shaq...it will be interesting to see what 37-38 year old shaq can do for them. Time has told us that adding ancient centers to a contender doesnt work. Denver isnt better than the lakers and adding a backup point guard isnt going to do it. Boston is viable and the opinion that they are better is at least debatable.
You are too good of a gambler to let your personal feelings dictate these bad opinions.