Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GPK
You hit it farther than me, that is it.
You seriously can't base the shots that you can hit vs. the shots I can hit on 1 round of golf. Especially givens the circumstances.
My handicap was a +4 for a while for a reason Marty. You don't go over a month without shooting a round over 69 without having alot of shots in your bag.
I promise you, when I was healthy and playing alot of golf, you and I could have played $100 a hole, 5 days a week, me giving you 3 a side...and I could have quit my day job  |
again kev you and lori are getting defensive here , i never said i was better , never once ever. i said if you took an un-biased set of people and we just hit shots i wouldn't lose in a vote 100% to 0% , there would be a percentage of the people who would vote for me simply becuase i can hit a driver 300 yards over a corner dogleg , out of 100 people i might get 4-8% of the vote - my entire point of the thread is going back to phil and tiger - it's a subjecitve vote having nothing to do with tournament reuslts
if those same people were told to look at our tournament results the vote would be 100 % to 0% in your favor no question
as for you giving me 6 shots in match play over 18 holes , if you want to play let me know - that would be a worth having a match for , i would have a puncher's chance