Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Sigh ... okay, once again, can you try to ignore the wrapper, and casting it as right-left, black-white argument, and look at the meat, the point of the article?
Can you leave politics out of it, and ignore that part, and talk about the point of it?
And again, you really have to stop making imaginary crap up out of thin air regarding other people. I obviously don't think this is a middle of the road viewpoint, as you might notice that in the message you are answering I already said I think much of the article is exaggerated. And sorry, I'm not a liberal, either.
|
The point of the article is to take shots at the GOP. If you cant see that...
Why would i leave politics out of an article that clearly is political? The writer isnt lamenting the degradation of American dialogue. he is lamenting the GOP's dialogue. Perhaps if he had included one of the Msnbc nut jobs in there too i could take his points as non political in nature.
If the article is slanted politically by your own admission, why would i "leave the politics out of it"?
And you are not only a liberal...you are a flaming liberal.