View Single Post
  #56  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:47 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
P6..

Here's the thing.. If they aren't fishing for a stallion success, how can they justify the expenses of their purchases? They can't make back on track what they're spending, on average.. No?

(And as a PS, aren't they welcome to all the Kip Devilles and Benny the Bulls they can find from original owners?)
My sense with IEAH is that it's now about being on the stage. (I'm assuming that Iavarone is living large, essentially on other people's money.) How else could you justify the purchase price for a filly like Stardom Bound, especially if they recirculate the money like most "racing" partnerships by selling the fillies/mares at the conclusion of their racing careers, or the reported price for I Want Revenge? With I Want Revenge's pedigree, at the numbers being bandied about for their 50% interest, the only way that they could get out financially was by winning the Derby, and we know how that went.

When IEAH was talking about the idea of a "thoroughbred hedge fund," I suppose that they may have been hoping to find potential stallions, but most of the horses that they bought did not "check the boxes" for future stallion success. That's why they couldn't buy horses like Majestic Warrior, Street Sense or Hard Spun. If they thought that they were going to make stallions out of horses like Kip Deville and Benny the Bull, then they were sadly mistaken, IMO, and subsequently learned that lesson (although I'm sure that those were very successful purchases, both financially and from a publicity standpoint, for them.)

As for Kip Deville, I'm sure the guy who bought him for $7,000 at Timonium as a 2YO and was racing him in Texas as a 3YO has few regrets about his sale of that horse.
Reply With Quote