View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:32 AM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Oh I assume he'll do enough for his connections to let him get drowned in the Derby. After that it would be a good a move for them to try the Met. They probably won't even consider it, but in my opinion, they should.

But, what do I know, when connections like Darley take a horse like Past the Point, who runs a terrific race in the Woodward, and then race him on synthetics, denying very real chances in Grade 1s like the Donn and Carter, it only reinforces the thought that far too often horses are denied their best chances to shine by misguided decisions.

Which spot will be tougher this year......the Whitney or the Jim Dandy? At this point there is a very real chance it will be the Jim Dandy. How many 3YOs do you think will race in the Whitney?
You're not going to get an argument from me about whether I'd like to see 3YOs taking on their elders earlier than has been the trend in recent years. It wasn't all that long ago that horses like Java Gold and Easy Goer prepped for the Travers in the Whitney, but that seems like ages ago.

Due to the competition from the Haskell and increasingly the West Virginia Derby, the Jim Dandy has largely been a race in recent years that has had one standout and a lot of allowance-type filler, even when we have a good crop of 3YOs such as in 2007. By comparison, perhaps with the exception of 2008 (due to weakness in the handicap division), the Whitney has been a legitimate Grade I race (almost a summit-meeting of division leaders) year after year. This year may be an anomoly; it's far too early to tell.
Reply With Quote