View Single Post
  #15  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:22 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
no way the govt can pay back the money lost. just think if they did that, everyone with a 401k would be lining up for the guv to pick up their losses as well. if you want protection on your money, put it in an acct protected by fdic.
yes, it sucks they lost their money. but perhaps they should have invested more wisely? too good to be true, no matter the bottom line #, always is just that.
Gov't was partially responsible for ignoring this fraud(when told about it.) I agree that investing has risks, but this wasn't simply a case of bad investing(it was fraud that they should have been protected from.) I agree with the part about "too good to be true." They should not get it all back, but I don't think they should get a total stiff. They should get a half, or a third etc. How is it we are bailing out companies that paid incredible bonuses out to people, but investors caught up in an absolute fraud(that should have been stopped much earlier) can't get any of their money back? I don't think the punishment(total stiff of some pretty decent citizens) fits our common American values. I think it's a special case, and shouldn't be over simplified. Of course, we shouldn't be bailing out bad investors, but these people never had a chance (lie after lie that should have been noticed by authorities that were paid by these citizens to do jobs like keep an eye out for scum like this.)
Reply With Quote