Quote:
|
Originally Posted by saratoga guy
I don't have year-by-year Wolfson stats in front of me in order to address the turnaround asserted by Indomitable
|
From an earlier post of mine in a different thread ...
From a decade long span between 1996 through 2005 - Wolfson has year in and year out been very consistant. His win % was between 15-to-23% - and his yearly ROI had never once risen as high as $1.80 in any of those 10 years.
Basically, the guy was just your solid 20% trainer who placed horses in spots they could win - but who's horses typically were overbet.
From '96 to '05 he was 374-for-1,869 (20% wins) $1.54 ROI.
Now, the same consistant guy who shows a 23% loss on the betting dollar over an entire decade - and never once raises his ROI as high as $1.80 for 10 straight years does the following....
2006: 44-for-168 (26% wins) $2.89 ROI
2007: 52-for-191 (27% wins) $2.15 ROI
2008: 62-for-204 (30% wins) $1.98 ROI
2009: 4-for-23 (17% wins) $2.69 ROI
From '06 to '09 he is 162-for-586 (27% wins) $2.32 ROI
A solid seven percent spike in win percentage and an otherwordly $0.78 spike in ROI!!
You ought not be a genius to see that something happened precisely between 2005 and 2006 that shifted Marty Wolfson from a solid dependable trainer into an absolute super trainer who's stable yields huge win percentages and spectacular profits from a betting standpoint.
He's obviously one of the trainers out there who has a real edge right now. Is it something illegal? Who knows. Is it something detectable? .. who knows. It would be extremely irresponsible to pretend that he doesn't.