Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I might need my tinfoil hat to post after that. But, isn't it possible that Bob Black Jack had a tactical advantage and used it? No one in that line up was even close to being able to go with him early and no one did. It had nothing to do with anyone taking back. I had no bet on the race, except for a pic 4 that busted in the first leg, so I'm not redboarding. But who should have been running with him early that didn't?
|
No, I am not gunna waste time on your back n' forth stupidity. I'll answer once, and that's the end of me putting up with your contrarian bullsht. Indian Weaver could have pushed him, but an irritant like you is gunna tell us nobody in here could? I don't mean go head n' head. I mean force a decent pace. Force him to run something up front. This is a grade 1, and he ran as fast as Indian Weaver (for 4f.) The Cal bred 2 year olds ran faster. Golden Spikes pushed the front on a 44'3 in the Kings Bishop. Into Mischief has run 44'1, and 44'2 . Guns on the table just pushed a 43'3. You're full of more bullsht than Texas.Wait n' see. I've got the discipline to allow you to now run your bullsht without having throw back. I have evolved past you.