Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
I read Varola, Romans, Rasmussen, Hewitt, and Palmer long before you did ... and understand a lot more about bloodlines than you ever will, honey.
Having access to databases doesn't mean that you understand them ... or understand what's written about them.
I'm still waiting for you to "prove" that the Sir Gallahad line was more influential than the Bull Dog line between 1946 and 1956.
You seem to have no problem pouring out inconsequential reams of useless data ... but the cat seems to have gotten your tongue on that one. When are you going to back up the ludicrously false statement you made about those two Teddy boys?
You're an absolute phony and hypocrite, girly.
|
Another hilarious post by the hypocrite of the century. Where can I purchase your books on thoroughbred pedigrees, Bold? Better yet, what magazine can I be privileged enough to read with your "expertise" research in it? As far as I know, you're the epitomy of a "cut and paster." Nothing that you have ever said on here is news to anyone...