
12-06-2008, 11:09 PM
|
 |
Goodwood
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
Here's my take on this from a race watching perspective.
In the glory days, Pletcher horses would win, even though, in most cases, they were getting the worst trips, as WIDE Johnny V was up (and giving his patented, wide, no cover, premature trips). You'd typically see JV beating on these horses on the turn and they'd still have enough to draw in the stretch.
Not happening any longer; these horses are not winning with JV up and, interestingly, in some cases, they'll win with another jock and a better trip.
I have no other evidence but something certainly stinks. Horses typically win when they get favorable trips. Horses winning when they don't get the best trip (or even when they get the worst trip) are a cause for a red flag. The dude was a juicer. No doubt about it. They took his drugs away and he's firing blanks (relative to past years). Having been around in the Oscar and Ferraiola , etc. eras, I'd like to think that I can spot juicers.
|
Very much agree with this
The Fleet Indian "upgrade" was what concerned me the most.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
|