Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
What exactly should the horseman do then? Accept a bad deal? Complaining about something is easy but actually coming up with an answer that is practical considering the circumstances is tough. Complain about the horseman all you want but the tracks (CDI especially) are the ones that dont want to make a fair deal, hiding behind the untruth that their ADW's would be unprofitable under the horsemans plan and that the horseman are to blame. Horseman simply want a similar cut of an ADW bet that they get from other types of bets. The tracks want to keep a greater %. You are the direct customer of the track. Bitch at them to make the deal.
|
I'm pretty sure I said I think the horseman don't care who can bet what and where. They shouldn't. That's not their concern. But it eventually will become their concern if things stay stagnant. It will become the track's concern, bettors, etc...
I'm not trying to come off as anti-horseman, I don't buy into the notion that the tracks are in the right. The tracks and their "sky is falling if we accept the horseman's plan" is laughable.
But that doesn't excuse the parties as a whole from blame in the exclusionary tactics that affect the consumer. It doesn't matter who is at fault, because everyone's fingerprints are on the mess. If I could blame the liberals on this one, I would, but for once they are not responsible.