Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
What am I overlooking? I just hope you never have a child with a disability or whatever.
|
You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.