Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Read it ROLLO. I said he is a good horse, but was worried about the trainer. Trainer did take a long time to get a win with him, but it is a Grade 1. Myself and JCS liked the horse a lot, and you said he just ran well because he broke poorly. If you couldn't tell that was a monster move on the turn that day, then you're lost. That was a stakes horse move, and you missed it. Go back and you will see everybody talking about the top 2 horses, and I didn't do that. I am picking out the winner of the Norfolk to talk about(while the rest of you were talking about the 2 that finished ahead of him.) He showed his hand to you in that 1st race he had, and you didn't see it. You were too busy calling it a fake move by a horse who broke poorly. That was a monster move that only really good horses can make 1st time out.
|
Listen, this is really pathetic. First off, I never said his move was fake. I only commented that his running style (one-run closer) might be different when he starts breaking sharper. Does he come from out of the clouds anymore? No. End of story. Never commented on his class.
In fact, I followed this horse the entire Del Mar meet. If you do a search, you will even see that I liked him in the Del Mar Futurity.
Since that race, you haven't said two words about the colt other than to disparage the trainer, who obviously had the colt going the right way. Also note, he has a modest contender for the BC Juvenile Fillies (Palacio De Amor) not to mention in years past, has had BC starters place in both the Juvenile ('97) and Juvenile Fillies ('96).
So I guess you were the person that was wrong about this horse (and trainer).