Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
I don't want the people who made these decisions to be given new money. In no way can we give new money to these rats who made bad loans (in order to make quick interest off of people who couldn't afford to get these loans.)If we put new money in, we need to make sure it's for new loans, and those loans need to be well secured, and it needs to be regulated. We did it the way the free market capitalists wanted, and they fkd it up, and all want to be bailed out now. I totally disagree with you about this not being a bail-out. They made loans they shouldn't have made. Now they want help to overcome those mistakes. That's a bail out. I don't think we should do it. If we do it, then don't let these same people in charge of money loaning. Don't give them new money to loan. I wouldn't trust either Bush or Paulson . Paulson was making 40 million a year off this industry, and now you get him to be in charge of a solution? He is gunna want to bail his crooked friends out. Have some sort of program, but don't let any of these crooks draw it up. Yes, these 2 have been lying all year, and now they come clean. F BUSH, F PAULSON(liar scum.) I can't believe he came in front of the country and told us it's so messed up. How do you do that after denying it all year?
|
SCUDS it would appear that you are aligned with the GOP Conservatives on this issue or am I missing your point. Because at the moment it appears that the DEM's are the ones propping up the Bush bail-out.
A lot of the points you have made seem to be more in line with Ron Paul.