Quote:
|
Originally Posted by docicu3
Assuming they go:
Dr. Decter has to be a BET AGAINST.
and...
I think it's far from 'nonsense' to call Dr. Decter a bet against. He obviously can win, but is an almost certain underlay.
__________________
The problem here was, in retrospect, that these comments are about a win bet in a thread that was about playing the P6.
The only reason I bring it up is that as a group we were not that far of from hitting the damn thing. If we were more focused on the positives from the efforts the group would likely make a ton of money instead of dividing itself into fractions of ineptitude of which I am as guilty as anyone here. Let's get something going fort omorrow and put this nonsense behind us.
|
What this really sounds like is a redboard. As a group? Huh? Was there some mythical $20K ticket that was being played with everyone's opinion that would have hit this thing? Because, even if Dr. Decter was singled ( a pretty brash assumption ) then how exactly were all the other winners going to get on a ticket?
Anyone that thinks my opinion ( I can't speak for the Fat Man ) suggested leaving him completely off a Pick-6 ticket would completely misconstrue my thoughts in this thread and just about everything I have ever said publicly. He was clearly an A in any serious Pick-6 play....just not a horse I would key on in individual race bets. These are two very seperate concepts.