I was really glad to see him race. I've seen him on the track several times since he's been here, and I went to see him in the paddock. I hadn't seen him that close up since the BC.
Anyway, the Beyer # in my mind is a moot point. I don't see it being used as publicity in his stallion ad, nor do I see it being used as a reference point for any horses coming out of the race. Sure, we can argue all day long, and the more we argue, the more things we'll find to argue about.
As far as his performance and what's next. I am not a trainer, nor do I play on on the internet, but from my point of view -- what I saw, I am not convinced he liked the track. I was there and watched the race very closely. I had an excellent view. More importantly, I heard several comments after the race that inferred the same thing -- not internet trainers or self proclaimed experts -- people who make their living in the business and who have qualified opinions. I also don't think being in a bit tight in the first turn helped, but he's older, more mature, had plenty of time to settle, settle in, etc. The pace and trip was another factor.
The way the race shaped up, I didn't expect that impressive move where he would eat up ground, power by, and so on. Didn't seem to be that kind of race to me -- and again, the track might have been a factor.
About where he goes next -- sounds to me like Jackson has put everything in play, at least to some extent, albeit small. If he doesn't seem like the kind of horse who would take to the poly/synthetic/etc. -- why send him? To be a "sportsman"? For the good of the game? Same old, age old, been there done that arguement. If the BC is in play, why not send him early, give him every chance. If not, so be it. The money title is nice but doesn't make him any greater in comparison to the greatest horses of all-time.
Eric
|