Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Handicappy
I sorta don't know what to make of all this. If someone disagree's with a certain line of thinking they are "classic" cases and are focused on to look foolish as ateamstupid suggests here. I thought the game was great because you can never understand it totally. That there is always more to learn. If that is true, than how can anyone be so absolute about their thinking?
And A-Team, if you want to take Unbridled's Heart out of my point please do. Then if you still think I am wrong, well maybe I am. But maybe I'm not. But if you think I am wrong about Godolphin, tell me why. Don't pick one single aspect out and tell me to defend my entire argument. I am just surprised that the handicappers who are very good and knowledgable, including you Steve, think nothing of jumping on someone's thinking. I thought this would be a place where my handicapping could improve and I could learn from you guys. But I really don't want to have to take a load of **** to get there.
|
Truthfully, I don't know enough about the Barrief Reef, Day Pass or Etched situations to opine on whether you're right or wrong there. You still haven't answered how Godolphin's management of Unbridled's Heart proves your point. You decided to use him as an example, you should be able to back it up, no?
If I make a point, I expect someone to question me if I'm making a weak argument (as Andy, mainly, usually does so wonderfully). I think you're taking this too personally. I thought your arguments were flimsy as to why Little Belle was a good horse and how Godolphin has been mismanaging their three-year-olds, so I called you on it. Feel free to do the same to me.