View Single Post
  #20  
Old 07-17-2008, 12:47 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
All-All-All-All is quite absurd no and quite disrespectful to me. Why even state it ? Is someone automatically Wrong when they do not share your opinion? It's quite logical if you go deeper you have more coverage to wild occurrences that you aren't going to get with smaller tickets. I 100% agree with you on the handicapping aspect it is by far the most important. On big days I usually have a caveman of about 144 and a few smaller tickets usually with a single or 2 and some longshots sprinkled in. And to your statement about the fringe coming in and not having coverage. I certainly would have coverage if I was anygood at handicapping.

PS... I only play Pick 3 and 4's...
He didn't "state" anything. He asked you how you would be more likely than Crist to hit a large ticket, and instead of answering, you got defensive.

The A/B/C/X method works toward minimizing investment and emphasizing handicapping. In the long run, I think it's the best method.

If I had $144 to invest, I'd rather find an Exacta or Trifecta or Double or Win bet I could have multiple times than put it all on a $1 Pick 4 and potentially watch four $5-$7 horses come in.

Last edited by ateamstupid : 07-17-2008 at 07:19 PM.
Reply With Quote