[2Hot4TV]

Originally Posted by ELA

Comments like this are very transparent and lack substance. On one hand, the comments don't really speak to specific cases or calls, but more to the overal quality of the announcer. The closing statement proves that. On the other hand, comes the effort where one has to grasp at a clearly isolated incident, which virtually everyone would "get" as a joke, done in jest, etc. This is the poor effort at justifying Durkin "really was never that good". It's like the "let me wait for a foolish example in order to validate some slanted opinion"

You want to tell me you don't like his diction, tone, style, specific aspects of his skill set, or something like that -- I'll buy it in a heartbeat. That opinion has substance, and justification. Maybe his style changes over time or his flair has evolved. But to make a blanket statement like "He was never really that good" has no credibility as far as I am concerned. Even those who don't like his style, or other aspects, will set aside their "personal" bias and state that he is one of the best the game has ever seen.

Eric

I dont like the majority of calls. He covers the first few (3) runners and is surprised when a closer hits the front. Now I cant call a race anybody would want to hear, but I can listen to one.