Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stonegossard
Board bully? Too funny. Because I disagree with you I am now a bully. I do post whats on my mind and dont sugarcoat things...big difference between that and a bully. As far as the game? I dont complain more than anyone else out there. If you are content with the current situation of horse racing (drugs...etc) then so be it. I think owners like Maggi Moss who continue to use questionable trainers are not good for the game. I dont see how any real horse racing fan could applaud someone like that. As far as her little horsey farm...IEAH is doin something very similar...does that make them good for the game? I said in my posts its ridiculous that she defends guys like DUtrow and Assmussen (as she did today)...not sure why you keep twisting around what I say.
If you dont like my posts fine...then dont bother with your rather ignorant posts to me. Funny how someone who ignores my posts knows so much about me.
Why would you call it my rumor board? Last time I checked I am not the one on here with the inside info posting rumors. In fact I NEVER post things I hear from people in the business. You seem like a very confused individual.  |
No not confused, I learned early on you pretty much argue with everybody over anything, so I skim over your mostly rude posts. For the most part all you seem to do is call people idiots and morons, trying to be a self appointed bully, not because you disagree with me. I could care less if you disagree with me. And seriously you are not funny, well maybe once in awhile, but there are far better comedians here than you, so spare us.
How comical you think my posts to you are ignorant. I just adopted and adapted your mode of posting.
Obviously you don't like being spoken to the way you speak to others. Isn't that called whining?
So lets get the record strait, maybe you should sharpen your reading skills...I said I neither liked nor disliked Maggi Moss. My opinion of her is not going to change anything, she will still have horses that I will bet on or against.
What I said was that you relayed information of an interview as if it was fact when your statements were false, gee I would call that rumor. Just like Amoss having a positive over a "feeling".
Obviously it was your perception of it which of course is fine, but don't represent it as the facts. There are casual readers that don't have access to HRTV and would take your synopsis as the truth when in fact it was not. Leading to....RUMORS!!!
I also never said I applaud them. Again you've missed the point. As stated by her today, that TX has zero tolerance therefore no commission to go to appeal therefore it has to go to court. In other juridsticions you can take it to an appeals board. I never said you post things from people in the business. So who is twisting what here....
Oh and there is little difference from the way you post your opinions and not sugarcoating..you come off as an idiot, moron(words you use when addressing others) bully.