Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FGFan
I never said I thought one way or the other whether or not they are good for the game. I just relayed what was actually said and NOT what you thought was said.
It's perfectly fine if you want to relay your take on an interview if you preference it by saying MY TAKE ON WHAT SHE SAID IS, or WHAT I GOT OUT OF THAT LAME INTERVIEW IS.....but you didn't you relayed it as fact which it wasn't even remotely what was discussed.
BTW she also didn't say it was sabotage, she said she thought it could possibly be contamination based on the findings of a renowned specialist. Another thought you had that you relayed as fact.
So let's see already in this thread we have people declaring that trainers got positives that never happened, discussions on how doable a woman owner is, and then your synopis of an interview that wasn't even remotely factual.
Yeah right and this all adds to making the game better.....  ...Gimme a break. |
My take wasnt factual? Please. Go back to your DVR and watch it again. Go back and actually read what I said.
And get off your f#ckin high horse ...I dont need someone like yourself telling me how to post on here. If you dont agree with what I said fine...but dont start this bs about how I should post.