Quote:
|
Originally Posted by miraja2
There have certainly been some exciting races in the history of the Breeders' Cup. I never said there weren't.
However, simply pointing to that fact and saying that it serves as sufficient evidence that the Breeders' Cup is good for racing is one of the most poorly constructed arguments I could possibly imagine. In fact, it is such an absurdly illogical argument that it seriously makes me miss King Glorious. At least he put some genuine effort into making arguments with which I strenuously disagreed.
In the end though, this argument is pointless. As far as I am concerned, it is an absolute fact that the Breeders' Cup has been bad for the sport. But who cares? There is no realistic chance that the Breeders' Cup is going to disappear any time in the forseeable future no matter how much I might wish for it. Instead it is actually spreading like a virus. Debating it is like talking about whether or not the NBA should eliminate the 3-point line. It isn't ever going to happen, so what is really the point?
|
MIRAJA let's say you were my doctor and you told me the following:
Look geeker if you don't stop chasing women, drinking, smoking and gambling or you are going to suffer health and financinal problems.
You know what I would do..because this is the crux of your argument.
get a new doctor....
Also, I think you are saying that it is your
opinion that the BC is bad for racing - because you can't say it is a
fact. Now if you expounded on your
opinion as to why you think it was bad - then you would be constructing an argument to support your
opinion, but it will still not be a
fact.
Don't mix
fact with
opinion - only Morty can do that.