Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Numbers are very often under review, as there are a variety of reasons that even one person thinks a number might not be the best representative of the performance. Subsequent efforts by horses, not necessarily exclusive to the race in question, might help bring that number more into focus thus necessitating a change.
As I've said here before, Beyer once said to me " we never change a number to make it less accurate. "
|
I thought that was one thing that might have something to do with it, but I'm just surprised to see it done. It's not like it was a high profile race/horse. It was a F & M NW1X NYSB 6f turf race, so I was just surprised when I looked at the PP's last night and saw the 80 in place of the 78.