Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
How about we compare the safe dirt tracks with the synthetics before all these people come up with meaningless statistics to support their case? What the committee should do is for the next two years track the all weather tracks against SAR, BEL, AQU, CD, GP, FG, and OAK and see what the results show. Make it clear to those tracks that if any of their individual breakdown rates are significantly higher than the average of the synthetic tracks, AND the dirt tracks as a group come out higher in breakdowns than the synthetics that pressure will be put on those tracks to switch to synthetics. If they show that dirt is just as safe or safer, or they can show that their individual track is as safe as the synthetics on average then they are free to keep dirt with no pressure from anyone. The current crap that is being compared is completely meaningless.
|
I feel ya man!! I dont know how they can compare top class horses running at del mar (eventhough they had there fair share of fatalities last summer) to a place that runs broken down claimers like finger lakes or mountaineer. No **** the numbers will be different. I totally agree with the tracks you chose to compare with artifical tracks.