Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
lets say it was your horse in the derby that broke down, and while you were dealing with the anguish, Peta named you as someone that should be suspended, without doing any type of investigation into whether or not you did anything wrong, but went right to the national media and called you out for sanction. would you still not be mad, and be talking about how great it is that they are speaking out?
|
They have to speak up now while the event is still getting coverage and still on people's minds.
Of course I would be upset if PETA blamed me for a horse's death and the death was not my fault. I would be upset but by the same token I would understand where they're coming from. They see something like this happen and they want to blame someone. That's understandable. But in this case, there may not be anyone to blame. It may have just been a fluke.
I don't always agree with PETA's methods but as long as they're trying to speak up for animals, I will give them the benefit of the doubt.
I can tell you one thing. Horseracing certainly does not do a good job of policing itself. If animal groups speaking out will encourage the horseracing industry to do a better job of policing itself then I'm all for it.
It obviously would have been better if PETA would have simply demanded answers and demanded an explanation, rather than criticizing individuals who were probably not at fault. But what do you expect? They know very little about horseracing.