
05-03-2008, 06:59 PM
|
Newmarket
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
You really need to take a step back and think about the content of my post, as it seems I struck a nerve.
The horse might've been the chalk and alot of EXPERTS went as far as saying he had the most ability BUT they stopped short of a full endorsement because of the points mentioned. I'm just tired of hearing these same old tired cliches used when someone doesn't have an opinion. Either you like a horse or you don't. Either you like the odds or you don't. Either you have an opinion or you don't. If you can't analyze the race, sit down. Oh, and the other cliche I forgot to mention: this year's race is not exciting because the horses aren't fast enough. WTF does that mean? 150,000 showed up.
But, for EXPERTS to come out strongly for Colonel John, or Visionaire, or Tale of Ekati, is a ****in joke.
Get my drift?
|
sorry, but you are really a huge blowhard.
|