Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Avery_Smartman
^^^
0-7 withut James.
Oh really?
Really.
It seems to me without Andy as well.
Oh...right.
And Mr. Pavilic was still trying to zero in on the side of a barn.
Oh....right.
So James out along with 2...not 1----2.....key components ....is that right?
Uh...yes.
So much for reliable "witnesses."
By the way......I was talking about all threads on this issue...not just this one.
Faulty testimony on your part...as per usual.
|
Were they without Varejao and without James for an extended period in February?? They were 8-4...again you refused to recognize this issue and statement and fact. But again, that sample doesn't fit your narrow brain. So you ignore it time and time and time and time and time and time and time and time again. I brought it up right away and you ignore it...I ackowledge all the correct facts you brought out. That is the difference between me and you. I am smart and you aren't.
You can't even acknlwledge relevant statements I make...you will not acknlowedge their record without Varejao and with LeBron as 8-4...it doesn't fit your "yeah, but they were 0-7 without LeBron AND Varejao, becuase there is actually a sample with LeBron without V...a lot of them. Actually it is 17-10...they were 9-6 without V and with LeBron in November and December...then 8-4 in Feb without him.
Failure to launch. I provide the facts and you will not accept them.
You can ignore every fact you wish and throw them under the bus...it is simply how you roll. I don't care. they have huge samples of playing with LeBron and without Pavlovic/Varejao/Gibson/Z. For you to base everything that the 0-7 was without LeBron but also without V is beyond the realm of stupidity in debating.