[horseofcourse]

And Spitzer is important because?? So he is what...the 73,913th politician lacking in a unified moral stance?? This is as big a non-story as Larry Craig's "wide" stance. AS long as they're not involved with minors I could care less who they are "not having sex with!" (or whatever clinton spewed about that!)...who they are having sex with...who they are seeking to have sex with...who they are paying to have sex with. They're politicians...the most corrupt people walking the planet for the most part. It is all quite humorous...you had the Hart's, Clinton's and all the Kennedy's...then recently all the repub stuff with Foley, Craig, Vitter, the guy in Illinois who was married to the Star Trek babe...he was so important I have no clue what his name is...gingrich...the youthful indiscretions of that Hyde guy when he was in his mid 40s!! Now another big democrat in NY down the tubes.

All I know is the one thing about both big time repubs and dems you can count on is these guys are getting massive amounts of non-marriage tail non-stop be it male or female...endlessly.

Today is the first time in my life I ever heard of the guy. Another brain dead politician...wow. Big surprise it has happened once again. I guess if I lived in New York I'd probably care more about it.

So I don't know much about the guy...would this news qualify as funny or sad?? You simply cannot find a non-corrupt politician anywhere. It is a null set. And we get tossed into elections with both sides continually throwing up more curruptness endlessly. AS a nation, whether we like it or not...I think it is going overboard on the endless fascination of who people are having sex with...especially politicians.