[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Well on this tangent, the messenger is of the utmost importance. In the bigger picture of what I talked about in my last post, the people saying it are absolutely to be focused on.

Because if their entire point is a claim of concern for life when talking about whatever-you-want-to-call-it at conception, yet they simultaneously show a flagrant disregard for life (and in some ways, seem to even take joy in actively supporting the destruction of life) in so many other areas -- it's not really out of bounds to come to the conclusion that it has nothing to do with life, and everything to do with controlling women.

Perhaps your position on the subject is more noble than those disingenuous folks I've just finished describing (and it comes from a different place...one I don't agree with, but the premise is more noble), but sadly for you -- your lot is cast with them. And as long as they keep acting like bonafide, anti-woman degenerates, your points all get lost in translation.

Sadly, I fear you are right...