Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Well,if I went 6 or 7 deep etc.,I was gunna use him,because he made a decent winning bid here last March(without much jock,)and tired going 7f.So,the problem really isn't this horse,it's not being able to get lean in the 8th.I'm 4 deep to hit the horse in the 9th.So,I needed to get lean in the 8th,and deep in the last.Didn't think that chalk in the 8th was a stand-out,but was the only horse doing anything late in that race.None of those horses in the last really give a ****.The 3 wins a quarter of his races,but he pulled the plug like a 1 for 30 horse.Kind of reminds me of last year at Tampa.The main was a lil tiring early in the meet.
|
Agreed Scuds.
In hindsight, the 9th was a 3 horse race, and a single was illogical. I tried to make a case for too many in the first two legs (all of which I felt were legit) but then again should have formulated a better opinion knowning how deep the last leg had to be, or not bet the play. As it was I used my original 4 picks (4 Crazybrook, 5 Bookmaster, 10 Little Paper Boat, and 11 Supahbuckdance) and added the 2 and 9 on further consideration..I purposely left Centeno's mount off at 7-2 because the horse made no sense and the furor over him winning 2 on the day and taking down the 6-5 in the last had folks betting him with "irrational exuberance" in my opinion. That left only 5 other options with the 1,6,7,8, and 12... none of which I could have logically made a play with...I haven't seen the replay did you happen to notice if the 11 pulling up had any impact on the field?