Quote:
Originally Posted by ALostTexan
Just read about this. Seems like if the prosecution was going to try to prove that these guys stopped 27 horses, they would have some sort of case, but the defendents didn't even have to testify.
If that was the case, I think that Fallon should have a case to sue for this. At least in the US he would, anyway...
|
"If that was the case, I think that Fallon should have a case to sue for this. At least in the US he would, anyway..."
no he wouldn't.
no. no. no. no. no.
okay.
so if a government entity gives you permission to bring a civil action against them you could do that.
theoretically.
in a universe where prosecuters admit they brought a case to court in bad faith.
and want to get sued.
sovereign immunity is alive and well. you still can't sue the king without his permission.