View Single Post
  #72  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:42 PM
horseofcourse horseofcourse is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 3,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
This is borderline retarded .Garvey hit .318
in the World Series. Perez hit .242 in the World Series.That's an 76 point difference.Anybody knows Cincy was a powerful offensive team,and the Dodgers were a mainly pitching team.In that situation what would you expect would happen to RBI.I mean ,hell Garvey has 36 World Series Hits versus Perez' 23.They both played in 5 world Series.Dodgers choked in WORLD SERIES in 74,77,78..So not many people to knock in.Garvey hit .356 in the NLCS VERSUS PEREZ' .234.GARVEY HAD 21 RBI VERSUS PEREZ 14.GARVEY HAD 8 NLCS HOME RUNS VERSUS 3 FOR PEREZ.Anybody who played for Cincy in the 70's is gunna get a huge RBI bias in stats.Garvey had 32 nlcs hits versus 18 for Perez.Garvey hit 76 points better than him in the World series,and Garvey hit 122 points better THAN HIM in batting average in the NLCS.THEY AREN'T CLOSE. PEREZ DOESN'T EVEN QUALIFY (MINIMUM 100)IN THE HOF monitor.He has a 81 VERSUS GARVEY'S 130.5.YEAH THAT'S REAL CLOSE YOU HALF ******.That's not name calling.Anybody can observe it's half retarded to write what you did.
Perez and Garvey had similar careers. I will repeat myself. Perez had much more power. He had an OBP 15 points higher in his career than Garvey. I consider OBP a more imoprtant stat than batting average. Perez had a higher career slugging percentage. HOF voters are more interested in regular season stats than postseason otherwise Don Larsen and Brian Doyle would be in the HOF. All I said was I don't think tony Perez belongs in the HOF. I don't think Garvey belongs in the HOF either.

Please do not use the word retarded to describe my posts on this subject. I am sure many if not most baseball fans would agree with me that Steve Garvey is not HOF material and many would agree that Tony Perez is aobut on a par with Steve Garvey as a player. In fact, many would consider him better and some (mostly LA fans) would go with Garvey which is fine. If I were picking a team I would choose the first baseman that got on base more, hit more home runs and slugged for a higher percentage over the higher average, less power 1st baseman. Personally, I would say Tony Perez is a better player than Steve Garvey. And I have stated from the beginning that I do not think Perez is deserving of the HOF either.
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?!
Reply With Quote