Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hockey2315
Scuds-
Calm down. . . I think you're having a difficult time understanding what I'm saying. . . I'll go real slow for you. . .
ok. . .
here goes. . .
the horse hadn't established a lane because it wasn't running straight. . .
and i'm not arguing over the clipped heels thing. . . that's not the point
your arguments have been incoherent and this is obviously not getting anywhere because you have difficulty separating the relevant parts of the incident from the irrelevant parts. . . so let's just agree to disagree. . .
maybe you should go to stewards school. . . i'm sure they have a remedial class. . .
|
The relevant part is that the lane was taken.That's pretty obvious that it wasn't open when he decided to move into it.99% of the time they are not gunna let a jock come into a lane when he isn't clear.This is the relevant part.You've decided to dip into the irrelevant stuff like whether he thought a horse would be there,or should be there.He thought he wouldn't be in the lane.It was a guess.It was a wrong guess.There was a horse there when he came over.Now,less professional riders are gunna start being more aggresive in their lane changes,and the stewards are going to regret this.