Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
"I guess it must be time for me to give "Pants" and some other folks the opportunity to bash me again"
you must have really missed nailing yourself to a cross the months you were gone.
"This is racism no matter what defense is offered, and no number of snide, belittling or attack-oriented posts directed forthwidth toward me will change that!"
i think you joyfully roll naked in snide, belittling and attack oriented posts. they allow you to demonstrate moral superiority.
|
Actually, I could care less...you attach far more importance to some folks than I do...I have plenty to keep me busy in the "real" world. It's funny though, nobody debates my point, just presents the same tired old rhetoric about "moral superiority". So...let me understand...if I dare call someone out for what I honestly believe is a racist statement, that makes me what? This is the same type of reaction that many folks complain about when simply disagreeing with someone of color and being labeled a racist. We can debate Jackson's actions, Sharpton's actions, "Calipso Lewie's" rhetoric but what does Tawana Brawley and Crystal Mangum have to do with the topic? And how does one skip over the vulgar behavior of Mike Nifong to include Ms Mangum in a discussion of "political whoring"? I have not called Nascar a racist, merely pointed out that his post is racist...what I would like to hear from him is why he added four people to the discussion...all of them black, while excluding obvious white examples such as Nifong...especially since he included the Duke case??