 
			
				10-20-2007, 08:15 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
			
				
				
				 Sha Tin 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
					
					
					
						Posts: 20,855
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by ELA
					
				 
				Chuck, I think we will end up disagreeing, and of course that's OK. It's a good thing. Perhaps I am talking about practicality and not a court of public opinion or something similar so to speak. 
 
I am also not talking about stupidity. Hiring and retaining an employee was not my point at all. I was more talking about liability. You are not going to hold George Steinbrenner legally liable and responsible -- and penalize and punish him -- because one of his players takes and gets caught using steroids. UNLESS, he knew about it and turned a deaf ear, or helped, aided, and so on. UNLESS he is found to be a party to the crime, or made the drugs available, and so on. UNLESS he was negligent, and so on . . . and so on and so on. I am certainly not going to argue the parallel because none exists. 
 
I thought my example was applicable, but with analogies there is always a great deal of interpretation. I was merely trying to show what I thought was a direct comparison. Do the laws and legislation exist in our sport and business? If they do not exist, then all that is left is what? Self governing or self policing? 
 
Like I said Chuck, I agree, owners must be held responsible. However, it must be done in not only the proper way, but in a prudent and legal way as well. I've said it before and I'll say it again -- in isolation, I am not pulling horses from a guy who gets a clenbuterol positive. Not one, not two and not three. Now, a hard core, designer, exotic, etc. drug -- that's a completely different issue of course. In this specific case, I move my horses -- period. But I am not pulling horses because of what "everybody knows" so to speak and of course that's not the case here. 
 
Anyway, we agree on the destination. We may just disagree on the journey to get there. 
 
Catch up later. 
 
Eric 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Eric I agree about the legal liability. Legal should be a moot point. But when guys make statements like Lizza did......do you really expect the people who bet on the sport to take all these "clean up the sport efforts" seriously? At some point the owners have to take the responsibility and make the call. I mean hell, racing was alive and well in this country before Pat Biancone showed up. We should be self regulating, not relying on racing commissions and legal gray areas. If a guy get caught redhanded, string him up. If a guy gets a clembuterol positive, different story...  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
				 
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |