Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARyan
Wow, I thought your posts were great untill this one Actually just that in bold the rest was still reasoned well and very much on point...
NYRA maybe improved, but it still needs much more reform (internally and with help from the State) to be a better not-for-profit.
Which brings up another interesting point. I have not seen anyone mention that NYRA is not, I believe, a "non-profit" but a "not-for-profit." While the differences are debatable, I believe they are very different. Its a different discussion, but one that I feel should be included when discussing the profitablity and bankruptcy's of NYRA and the State of NY.
|
To be honest, I thought I said that. I did mean that. I did not point blank say that they need much more reform, but I agree, along the lines of the things I was talking about -- transparency, accountability, and so on. However, one component that is absolutely needed for a better NYRA -- is not only internal, but external -- is a complete overhaul of the laws, legislation and operating environment.
As far as Spitzer, I expect many people to have different opinions and tastes. That's why Baskin-Robbins has all those flavors, LOL.
Regarding the not for profit and nonprofit aspect, I've heard too many people debate nonprofit, not for profit, quasi-nonprofit, quasi this, that, and so on. Professionally, and personally, I have much involvement in the (let's just call it) nonprofit world.
I wouldn't debate the issue, as in this forum it's a fallacious arguement. However, not for profit and nonprofit -- both are a tax status, they are not a management style.
Eric