Quote:
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
Ummm ... like we weren't handicapping the race ... but kind of like you know responding to the people who were so judgmental ... and they were saying like this horse is really so great ... and like we're "Hello ... then why does this great horse like lose every time he runs against good horses?" ... and they're like "He wasn't himself ... he was horny" ... and we're like "Yeah ... tell me all about it ... I've been there" ... and then we're like "Hello ... what does being horny have to do with it?" And we're just like trying to analyze what happened ... and not like ... you know ... pick winners ... because picking winners is so judgmental ... and we're like "Hello ... judgmental? If that's what you have to be ... I'm outta here" ... so like when these people say how great this horse is ... we're like "Gag me with a spoon?"
You know?
|
Why do you care? It's evident that you can't pick winners, so why are you even commenting on LITF? Let others think what they want. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion (even if it doesn't match yours.

)
My personal opinion is that LITF is an animal and not a robot. He's not going to be perfect and he's allowed to lose. He's no claimer... he's a better than average horse who has won more money than most thoroughbreds ever will. I would be a happy camper if I owned a "loser" like him.