Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Why is it that he "didnt take to the track" in races on tracks that he had already raced and won at?
I heard the track excuses when he lost in his combacker. How do you not like your home track???????
His career best beyer was at calder. Lost there now.
Second best beyer was at belmont. Lost there now.
So, if he goes to Saratoga and loses again there, will he not like the track?
Why hasnt he run a single race in So Cal? We are going on his third season in training and races at 8 or so different tracks but still not a race in So cal. Why is that? Could it be because the early pace scenarios in So Cal sprints are generally greater than anything you will see in the east? Wouldnt that support what Arljim is saying?
Why cant you look at facts...facts provided here in this thread? Why are you looking for these intangibles?
Are you that desperate for a hero?
|
OK ... Dalakhani ... I think I've finally figured out what they're saying. It's very complex ... so try to follow it closely. Here it is ...
Horses win races when they "take to the track" and "fire" ... and horses lose races when they "don't take to the track" and "don't fire."
It took me quite a while to understand that ... because it's so deep and so profound. Were you able to follow it ... or should I try to explain it further?