a witness to the latter part of the confrontation said that he was subdued, not struggling--just kept talking. but wasn't fighting back, not moving, they had him under control--so why tase him? i think just to shut him up--and talking isn't illegal--nor is it resisting.
it was supposedly an open forum, questions could be asked by anyone on any subject. but i guess that was only if the right any subjects came up. he supposedly took too long, so they cut off the mic. but the campus police were right there, so eager to grab the guy. it seemed mishandled, and sheer overkill, from the start.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
|