Quote:
|
Originally Posted by King Glorious
No, it's not a bad thing at all. He just doesn't represent the kind of horses that we are talking about when we say we miss the way top horses used to be campaigned. Nothing more, nothing less.
And yes, I only have interest in the horses that I think are the top performers. Which often times are not the same ones that others think are lol.
|
Personally, I do feel sentiment for the horses that go down. But to each his own. And just as the horses you consider "top class" may well not be on someone else's list, you certainly can't expect anyone else to ipso facto agree with your assessment that this was not a top class animal. So you jump forward from your subjective determination of a top class horse (whatever that may be) to being critical of someone's opinion who happens not to agree with how you define "we?"