[Danzig]

can't help wondering tho, are todays horses really more fragile? or does the dollar dictate the sparse racing schedule, the early retirement? i think it is partly responsible for the barely double-digit starts for most horses. look back over the years, take man o war for instance. he raced the exact same number of races as secretariat, 50-some years later. both raced only at two and three. both were highly prized in the shed. both retired sound. count fleet, who ran in the forties, smack between the two big reds, raced 21 times as well, the same number as the other two. also retired at three, after the belmont (sound familiar?). dr fager, native dancer and seattle slew ran at four, with doc and native dancer running 22 times, and slew only 17.

the use of drugs is a bone of contention, keeping horses on the track that years ago would not have been, BUT by the same token, miracles of modern science have helped to heal horses that years ago would have been lost.

i think many horses are handled with kid gloves these days not so much due to fragility, but due to monetary value. it's no longer a sport, but a business. it's not a matter of who breeds the best horse and proves it on the track, but who can win a fancy race and beat the rush to the shed.