Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Danzig188
you'd think an outstanding handicapper such as yourself would want him to keep running--that way you could get a better price on your winners.
lol oh, wait. there's not much betting in this country for those who predict a loser, rather than naming a winner, is there?? you brave soul you, bucking the odds of choosing one loser from many, rather than taking the easy way of picking the one winner!
|
The entire premise of your question is mistaken. Perhaps you haven't read my past posts ... which is completely understandable.
But I've posted many times that I am not a "handicapper" ... I haven't placed a serious bet on a horse since 1967. I don't have the time that's required to follow day-to-day racing to the extent that's needed in order to be a successful bettor ... and I know it ... that's why I don't bet.
But I do have the time to watch and analyze G1 dirt racing ... which is what I've been doing since 1958 ... and I'm knowledgable enough to recognize when a horse doesn't finish his races with conviction against weak fields ... and is thus very vulnerable against strong fields.
Lost In The Fog is not himself a fraud ... he's just a horse ... it's the over-the-top over-evaluation he was given by naïve goo-goos that was ... and is ... fraudulent.
You do understand that ... don't you?