Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
Fine but first of all, we seem to be talking about apples and oranges here....genetics and how they scientifically work is different than understanding pedigrees and what pedigrees work and why....there is nothing scientific behind my study....my studies are all analytical and on paper...not in the physical sense...
As for Stich, I was only using her name to make a point because most people know her pretty widespread for her pedigree write-ups in the Form...I haven't read one for years either and I know that she is Captain Obvious...I was making a point more than anything....
|
Oh ok Joel. For a minute there I was terrified that you actually considered anything she wrote to be of value. I have to tell you that last year before the Remsen and the Demoiselle she did an article detailing the chances of the horses in those two races at winning in the first dirt stakes for that generation going a mile and an eigth. In the Demoiselle she literally wrote up every horse except one and extolled the virtues of their pedigrees. The only ones whose pedigree she didn't like and that she didn't write up was Wonder Lady Anne L. Gee, guess who won? Nah, a daughter of a horse who won the Derby and Preakness won't like going two turns, nah, no way.