Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
I'm not sure if that is even allowed these days, I think that would also not be allowed because of possible insensitivity to other religious groups.
Just seems kinda silly that this issue took up the time of the supreme court.
|
the supreme court chooses which cases to hear, so they evidently felt it was worth their time.
no, it may not be the best example of rights being trampled--but it's one of several rulings lately that gives me and others pause. and of course many feel that any chipping away of rights weakens the constitution. i agree. altho most would say that what the boy did was silly, or inane, or somehow promoted drug use ( i wouldn't go that far, i think he did it to get attention, and it worked), and that they found it offensive (have to wonder, what if it had said bong hits for bozo the clown?) it is his right to express himself--whether his stance is popular or not. and the constitution is designed to protect the unpopular view.
it kills me whenever people say majority rules. it does NOT rule. the constitution was written to protect the minority, as majority rule can quickly become mob rule.