Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
If you say he is a nice horse then that is ceratinly the opinion your entitled to....many analysts in the sport would say that he is a VERY average animal who hadn't won in an ice age, and to set a track record at Churchill Downs is not something to take litely.......this is a serious track with a lot of pride and tradition for it's track records....Greater Good did NOT deserve a track record at that track.....maybe somewhere like Fonner Park..
|
They just said that he was a nice enough horse.
I'm here in Louisville, and consider Churchill to be my home track. I certainly don't mind if he has the track record, and he definitely better than about 80% of what I have seen on the track this spring meet.
He has beaten nice horses on separate occasions in his career, and seems like he has overcame some problems and Holthus had him right for that one.
Who would you prefer hold the track record at that distance, Joel? It seems to me that it wouldn't be a bad thing for a horse trained by a Churchill trainer who has been here year in and year out to run a good race and get a track record.