Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsy
You're sarcasm is unnecessary, Miraja. Do you think that those of us who disagreed with Oracle did so just out of spite? I'm sorry, but I remember those posts and there was absolutely nothing wrong with them. Oracle was raving about the potential greatness of a horse who had won one race -nothing wrong with that, of course (if you can't get excited about a talented baby, then the sport isn't for you), but some of us simply wanted to see more before calling him the second coming of.........(fill in the blank). If it's ok to go ga-ga about an inexperienced horse, then it's just as ok to be a bit skeptical.
|
1) What sarcasm? I was not being sarcastic in any portion of my post.
2) No I do not think that those of you who disagreed with Oracle did so out of spite. I never said you did.
3) People were criticizing him for being so excited about this horse. I simply stated that "maybe those people who criticized Oracle for the way he hyped this 2yo are satisfied now." I don't see what is so bad about that statement. Maybe they ARE satisfied. Maybe they are not. In my opinion they should be after the colt's performance today. That was my point.