Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Bid
If the Cavs had a coach they would be waiting to see who to play in the finals. The coaching job for Cleveland is pathetic. The drawn up play calls at the end of the halfs are brutal, the adjustments they make at halftime are non existant. Everyone keeps saying "Cleveland is flat in the third quarter, Cleveland has struggled in the third" They havent struggled, the coaches havent made the adjustments they need to at the half to ensure a win. They get up by 12, and they dont knock the Pistons out. They should have closed out both games in Detroit too, they are younger, faster, more talented, the coaching is terrible. If Flip Saunders wasnt the second worst coach in the NBA the Cavs would be in trouble.
|
There are ebbs and flows to games. Period. Especially with two evenly matched teams. So if the Cavs had a good coach they would have been 82-0 during the regular season and 12-0 in the playoffs to this point because they would have always made the "proper" adjustments at halftime?? Try to employ a bit of seriousness here. I am not understanding your points here. I find it funny the two worst coaches in the NBA are matching up in a conference final.
Things happen with human beings. These are not robots playing. They will at times miss. LeBron missed a wide open layup in the 3rd quarter. So the logic behind that missed layup is because Brown made poor adjustments at halftime?? Billups made a contested jumper to open the 3rd quarter with someone right in his face. So the reason he made that shot was because Brown didn't coach properly at halftime??
So the reason LeBron made 2 foul shots at the end of the game is because Brown made proper adjustments in the 4th quarter???
So your basic argument is that Brown is a tremendous "in-game" coach, because they always play better in the 4th quarter this series than the
3rd. Or something like that.